Inside the Asian Institute of Management, Joseph Plazo—founder of the algorithmic trading firm Plazo Sullivan Roche—broke the rhythm of praise for AI with a moment of reckoning.
Inside one of Southeast Asia’s most influential business schools — What he offered instead was something rarely heard in AI circles: resistance.
“The machine may be faster. But are we still the ones deciding what matters?”
???? **Joseph Plazo: A Technologist Sounding the Alarm**
He’s not critiquing technology from a safe distance. His firm’s AI systems have posted a 99% win rate across key timeframes and are in use by institutional clients across Europe and Asia.
Still, he asks: what happens when efficiency erases human context?
“Optimisation is only part of the equation,” Plazo explained. “Direction, purpose—those remain human.”
He shared a case from the early days of the pandemic. One of his firm’s bots flagged a short on gold just before the U.S. Federal Reserve issued an emergency policy shift.
“We overrode it. The algorithm was correct—but profoundly unaware.”
???? **When Pausing Is a Form website of Leadership**
Traders are trained to move quickly—too quickly.
“In high-volatility moments, the pause is where leadership happens.”
Plazo introduced a framework he calls **“Conviction Calculus”**—three questions that must be asked before executing an AI recommendation:
- Does this decision align with our values—not just our strategy?
- Have we cross-checked this with human knowledge—not just system signals?
- Will anyone say, ‘This was my call,’ or just point at the machine?
???? **The Bigger Picture: Asia’s Tech Acceleration and the Governance Gap**
Across Asia, nations are investing heavily in fintech and AI-driven innovation. From Singapore to South Korea, the push toward automation is framed as economic strategy.
But Plazo’s question cuts deeper: “We’re scaling faster than we’re thinking.”
He warned of systems designed to win—but not to pause.
“These weren’t errors of greed or emotion. They were perfectly logical moves—executed without context.”
???? **The Alternative: Narrative AI That Considers More Than Numbers**
Plazo is not anti-AI. He’s pro-responsibility.
His firm is developing what he calls **“narrative-integrated AI”**—models that factor in geopolitics, tone, and social context alongside market data.
“The future isn’t faster bots—it’s smarter, humbler ones.”
At a private dinner after the event, multiple venture capital leaders discussed collaborations.
One investor called Plazo’s talk:
“A blueprint for ethical AI in an unequal world.”
???? **What Happens When No One Says ‘Stop’**
Plazo ended with a thought that may echo across boardrooms:
“We won’t be victims of chaos—but of unchecked confidence.”
Not a warning against AI—but a demand for wisdom to go with it.
Because when machines take over the trades, conscience cannot be coded out.